🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies looking for data to train their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.